PR On a Shoestring

March 21st, 2009

Many small companies, like KidPub, have to watch every dollar spent. I’m always looking for ways to cut costs while not sacrificing either quality or progress toward my business goals. For a publishing company, PR is incredibly important, but it can also be incredibly expensive. We send out a press release for each books that is published, plus releases for contest announcements and general news.  It can add up to five to ten releases each month.

When I started shopping around for a PR agency to handle my account, I quickly realized that press releases were going to be a significant slice of my marketing budget. I wanted to know if there were alternatives to traditional agencies that might save money but still be effective.

I’ve used some of the online firms in the past with limited success. They typically charge a per-release fee with a suite of add-on services that can inflate the final bill. These companies, such as PRWeb, do an ok job of sending out your release and tracking it, but it seemed that my releases were getting lost in the flood of PR that goes across their wire.

Finally, by a stroke of luck, I found Mondo Times and its sister site, EasyMediaList. Mondo’s goal is to be a source of media information. Say you wanted to send a letter to the editor of the Milwaukee Herald. it takes just a few clicks on Mondo to pull up contact information for the paper. Mondo is a membership site, and to get the phone, fax, and email of the editor it’s $80 a year.

That’s actually a pretty good deal, and I use this service to look up editorial information for hometown news media of each author that publishes with KidPub Press. I’ve found that the local newspaper nearly always will run a story about the young author.  Mondo lets you search by city, so it’s quick work to find the half a dozen news outlets in an author’s hometown and put together a list for the press release.

The better deal at Mondo, though, is their Professional level membership at $199 per year. You get all of the data and lookup features of the $80 membership, but you also get five free mailing lists for Mondos sister site, EasyMediaList.

EasyMediaList sells contact lists for media. You can purchase lists by state, major metro area, subject, and so on. The lists are priced according to size and range from $30 to a few hundred dollars each.  For KidPub, I used four of my five free lists from Mondo membership to grab the top 100 media outlets, the educational media list, and the parenting and kids media lists. The lists are high-quality (for example, Parenting Magazine, Scholastic, Nickelodeon, and Sports Illustrated Kids are included) and clean…I get very few bounces on the emails included.

I send out press releases to segments of these lists, depending on what the news is. Do they work? Yes. I’ve gotten responses from many major media outlets from releases sent to these lists. It’s well worth the $200 annual membership fee.

The other piece of the shoestring is Skype. We only have one phone in the office, and for $5 per month we’ve set it up with an inbound phone number and unlimited domestic calling, and it includes an answering machine. I can afford to spend afternoons on the phone calling media contacts…the phone numbers are on the EasyMediaList lsits…to follow up on press releases. I think that editors appreciate hearing an actual person on the other side of the press release, and I’ve gotten a great response.

Between Mondo and Skype the majority of KidPub’s PR needs are met, and I can concentrate on growing the business instead of worrying about the marketing budget.

perryd marketing, tools

Addicts, Regulars, and Passers-by

March 11th, 2009

I’ve written before about Quantcast and how I believe that they are one of the few services producing reliable market data on website performance. One of the features that they offer is a little graphic showing the mix of users of your site. They don’t name it, but it’s a kind of classification graph that splits your traffic among addicts, regulars, and passers-by.

An addict is someone who visits your site at east once each day. Regulars visit at least once each month, and passers-by drop by once and then never show their face again. Here’s an example from KidPub:

kp-addicts

The way to read the information is that fewer than 1% are KidPub addicts and represent 4% of all visits.  Fourty four percent of the traffic is from regulars, who represent 20% of all visits. Just over half of the traffic is generated by passers-by, who make up 80% of all visits.

This is extemely useful information that shows that I need to work on converting passer-by into regulars. These numbers are substantiated by the Google Analytics bounce rate number for the home page of about 70% (in other words, 70% of visitors to the site leave after viewing the front page of the site).

In comparison, here’s what Facebook looks like:

facebook-addicts

Well over half of their visitors are regulars, which is where I’d like KidPub to be, too. Facebook rival Myspace has a similar pattern. These are sites that are capturing and keeping a community of loyal users. Even though KidPub has a dedicated group of users, we need to do a better job of pulling in the passer-by, helping them see that KidPub can be a fun, engaging place to visit again and again.

Data like this can be invaluable in helping you track and understand your traffic and should be the baseline you use to measure work done in this area.

perryd building traffic, facebook, site optimization, tools

Marketing to Tweens

March 3rd, 2009

I saw an interesting article in Delivery magazine today profiling the US tween market (kids ages 8 to 14), which is our market here at KidPub. There were a couple of factoids that stood out. First was the size…23 million strong. Next was the average disposable income, $2,047.

The last fact was the most fascinating. Of the 23 million tweens in the US, eighty five percent (85%) spend at least one hour PER DAY on the Internet. That’s a $47B market that is spending a minimum of 5 to 7 hours per week online.

I don’t think we’ve really figured out yet how to deliver a message to tweens in a way that is responsible, respectful of their age, and yet effective. This is population that doesn’t notice banner ads, pop-ups, pop-unders, or contextual advertising. The kids I’ve talked with about it say that they simply ignore this kind of advertising.

It seems like old-fashion word of mouth (or word of mouse, these days) is probably the most effective way to get a message out to this group. Social networks are starting to show their potential for this kind of marketing, but few will admit to targeting tweens. Facebook demographics are continuing to skew older, and although it’s hard to assess Twitter’s audience, I think it’s also an older crowd.

At KidPub we’ve offered more than one word-of-mouth program, including a reward for referrals and an invite-a-friend link on every page. None have really been successful, and we’re still looking for a way to encourage our members to invite their friends.

The bottom line is that tweens represent an exciting market, but one that is already savvy and largely resistant to marketing methods that have been around for as long as the web itself. We’ll continue to market one tween at a time!

perryd marketing , ,

SEO Results Continue to Improve

February 27th, 2009

I’ve written several times now about the SEO work I’m doing at KidPub. In addition to the optimization steps described in a previous post, I’ve also moved to a new Drupal template that is more SEO aware. The old template, Aurora, was pretty but a bit quirky in the way it handled placement of elements in the output stream, and about how it labeled text elements.

The new template, Sky, optimizes elements for search engines by using H1 and H2 tags more appropriately, and by trying to present content to the search crawlers first.

The result of all of this is that the SEO rankings for KidPub continue to improve. We’re now the #1 results for eight key phrases (and one oddball), and other phrases and search terms are moving up into prime territory. Here’s this week’s chart from SheerSEO:

seo-2-27-09

The positive movement on our key phrases is really encouraging, and we’re already starting to see increased traffic from Google.

If you haven’t started working on SEO, do it now. If your site is like mine, 60% or so of your traffic is coming from search engines, but if you’re not on the first page of results, you’re not being seen by the majority of searchers.

perryd Uncategorized

Is FaceBook Advertising Effective?

February 21st, 2009

Earlier I wrote about implementing FaceBook advertising as a way to reach KidPub’s young market. I’d dug up $350 in coupons for ad credit and spent about two weeks spending it, testing out different ad copy for click-through rates. Once the $350 in free ads was burned through I backed off to a budget of $150 per month, just to see if FaceBook could really bring qualified traffic to the site.

I’m advertising our publishing program on FaceBook…KidPub Press publishes books written by kids age 15 and younger. The goal is for a new viewer to download our publishing guide, a PDF that explains the program.

Here’s a Google Analytics chart showing traffic from Facebook during and after the $350 campaign:

You can see that over the past 30 days we’ve received 614 referrals from Facebook. The $350 campaign ended about a third of the way through the period.

The ad with the best CTR sees about 65,000 impressions per day on FaceBook, with a CTR of roughly .05%. Because daily spending is capped we get around 25 click-throughs per day. Of the 25 visits, an average of 5, or 20%, download the publishing guide. We capture email addresses as part of the download process, so we are building the marketing list for KidPub Press at a steady 100 to 150 per month.

We’re projecting that 1% or so of the folks who take the trouble to download our publishing guide will sign up for a publishing package; an optimistic number is 2 new book deals each month, which makes the FaceBook ads a good investment. We also will reach out specifically to FaceBook users who download the guide to talk to them about the ad in an effort to improve the effectiveness of our Facebook advertising. Our average cost per lead right now is about $1.

Would CPM advertising be more cost effective? Probably not for us. Our effective CPM (eCPM) on FaceBook right now is just under 7 cents. It’s unlikely that we would be able to see ads served in a CPM campaign for a bid under 10 cents, and we’d likely need a bid in the 15 cent range to achieve the same number of click-throughs. I’m comfortable with an eCPM of 7 cents, especially considering the side benefit of brand recognition as 65,000 ads are served each day to my target audience.

perryd advertising, facebook

Video and Google Results

February 17th, 2009

David Berkowitz just posted an interesting article on MediaPost about a study that suggests video content is 53 times more likely than text to make the first page of Google search results.

I’m not convinced. In the original Forrester study, the numbers just don’t seem to add up to the conclusion, which is that SEO optimized video content increases your ranking in search results. How many optimized videos didn’t make it onto the front page? How many of the videos that were on the front page were not optimized? Did the meta data for the video content even match the search query? We aren’t given any of this information.

It’s a bit like noticing that there are several blue arrows in the bullseye on the archery range and jumping to the conclusion that you should paint your arrow blue to increase your accuracy.

perryd Uncategorized

Analysis of Facebook Advertising

February 5th, 2009

It took ten days to burn through $350 of free advertising on Facebook. I ran five ad variations to test click-through rates and styles (for example, using a graphic versus not). I set a daily maximum of $35, and a CPC rate of 18 cents.

I have a couple of observations.

1. The targeting capability of FB is pretty good. My ads were aimed at kids 15 and younger, which required an approval from FB. I noticed that impressions were nearly zero each day until about 4pm, when kids started getting home from school. After 4pm they picked up dramatically and continued strong until the number of click-throughs hit my daily maximum.

2. Impression rates are good. In ten days my ads saw just over four million impressions. The effective CPM was about 9 cents, which is an excellent price in today’s market. It wasn’t possible to check ad placement, unfortunately.

3. Click-through rates are terrible. Average CTR for the best-performing ads was about .04%. On other networks, and on my own site, CTR ranges closer to .2%

4. However, Facebook provides a breakout of data based on unique impressions and clicks. For those 4M impressions, just over 1 million were unique, and the unique CTR was closer to .1%.

Here’s a look at visits to the target of my ads during the test:

You can see that there was a significant impact during the run of ads. The average deal for the target product is about $100, so a relatively low conversion rate will recoup my ad investment.

Will I continue with FB ads? Yes. I think that FB is delivering my target audience in a measurable way, and providing brand awareness among kids 15 and younger. It was nice to use FB’s money to do testing, and I’m using the highest CTR ad in the current campaign.

I found that an ad with a graphic did considerably better than one without, and that offering a free downloadable guide performed best of all. No surprises there. I capture email for downloaded guides, so in addition to building awareness and putting literature into the hands of a potential client, I’m building my marketing base.

perryd Uncategorized

Two tools for tracking search keyword placement

January 27th, 2009

I’ve been working over the past few months on better search-engine results for several key phrases related to KidPub. There are two tools that I’m using to help track them:

SheerSEO
This site monitors weekly changes in placement of search results on Google and Yahoo. It’s currently free to sign up. You can track a large number of search phrases, and the results are shown in an easy to understand table. You can also export the results to a Excel file. Here’s a snip of a recent report:

You can see that ‘kids stories’ is moving up nicely, from 37th spot to 24th. You can also see that ‘publish my story’ doesn’t point to KidPub’s home page, which I need to fix.

SheerSEO’s service runs once per week and sends an email to you when new results are ready. You can add or remove search terms at any time.

You can see a position chart for each phrase on either Yahoo or Google:

I think that this is really useful information, and it saves me the trouble of having to track and chart a spreadsheet full of keywords. I can measure the effect of changes I make on KidPub, both positive and negative, and know when I can stop tweaking.

SEOBook Rank Checker
For spot checks I like to use SEOBook’s Rank Checker, which is an add-on for Firefox. You can grab it from the SEOBook site. Even though it does offer historical information, I tend to use it when I want to know how a particular keyword is standing on Google or Yahoo (it also does Live Search). There’s a scheduling option that will run the checker periodically for you in the background.

The results are typically identical to SheerSEO’s.

Both tools give you a great bit of intel on how your SEO work is progressing, and you can quickly see if something has either gone wrong (fix it!) or is working well (duplicate it!). This level of detail might seem overwhelming, but remember, half to three-quarters of your site’s traffic is probably coming from Google and Yahoo, so it make sense to pay attention to search reult positioning!

perryd seo, site optimization, tools

Closing in on 100K!

January 26th, 2009

Back in August, KidPub was ranked around 400,000 by both Compete and Quantcast. We targeted the 100,000 mark back in November when we started doing serious work on building traffic, mainly through SEO and grass-roots marketing. I just looked at today’s Quantcast number119,146. Last week was 127K or so. We’re getting closer!

Once we hit the 100K mark the hard work begins…gettting KidPub into the top 50K web sites. I know there are ways to ’spoof’ Alexa to get a high ranking, but Quantcast numbers don’t lie, since they are directly measured.

We’re not getting many conversions yet from the Facebook ads, but the exposure is helping a bit, I think. It’s only been three or four days since the FB campaigns started…it needs more time before I can really analyze the results. We’re still watching click-through rates on several ads to figure out which are the best performers.

perryd building traffic, facebook, marketing, seo

Free (Ad) Lunch on FaceBook

January 23rd, 2009

I’m not sure why it took me so long to figure out that Facebook is a seething pool of KidPub’s target audience. The site is aimed toward kid ages 8 to 15, and there certainly are a few of them on FaceBook. A blog post over at StartupNation prompted me to take a look at advertising opportunities on FaceBook.

Ads on FB are similar to Google Adwords. They are small, textual (though you can add an image) and appear in an ad bar at the right-hand side of the page. If you run Adwords campaings you can likely run the same ads on FB.

What is great about FB advertising is that they offer you the option of targeting a specific audience, and provide a rough estimate of how many users are in the particular set:

My target audience is kids 15 and under, and FB estimates about 2,000,000 users in that range.

Like Adwords, you can set daily spend limits, set the bid for either CPM or CTC ad types, and track progress. The first ad I placed has run for about 12 hours with 142,000 impressions and 64 clicks. Not a great ratio, but my cost-per-click is lower that on the Google ad network, and I hope that I’m reaching a higher concentration of my target audience. I’ll post about conversion rates when I have some data.

Ah, the free lunch part. The StartupNation blog pointed out the value of advertising on FaceBook. I started doing a bit of resarch, and kept running acroos bloggers saying, “For goodness sake, don’t spend YOUR money on ads…use coupons!”

Sure enough, a bit of Googling turned up lists of coupon codes to redeem at FaceBook for advertising. I spent about half an hour hunting and submitting, and ended up with $350 credit in my ad account. Coupns are used before your primary source of funding (a credit or debit account), so for a week or so I can play with ad styles, formats, and copy and see what works well, using FaceBook’s money.

perryd Uncategorized